|
|
|
South Asia in India's focus
|
|
|
|
Top Stories |
|
|
|
|
D.C. PATHAK | 20 Jul, 2021
Developments in Afghanistan marking a steady rise of Taliban's hold on
that country -- this resulted in the evacuation of staff from the Indian
Consulate at Kandahar -- confirms many readings on how the Pak-Afghan
belt would shape up in the aftermath of the withdrawal of American
troops from the messy theatre, the scene of an unending 'war on terror'
launched by the US in Afghanistan way back in the wake of 9/11.
The
date of withdrawal finally announced by President Biden had taken into
account the fact of Taliban refusing to abide by its own part of the
Doha agreement about eschewing violence during the run-up to the
intra-Afghan dialogue that was meant to evolve the future set-up of the
country. The US excessively relied on Pakistan as 'a friend in need'
facilitating the interaction between the Taliban and the American Envoy,
Zalmay Khalilzad, and evidently ignored the deep-seated vested interest
that Pakistan had in helping the Taliban to regain its stranglehold in
Afghanistan. The US was also not bothered with the implications of the
Sino-Pak military alliance providing a great advantage to Xi Jinping's
China in a country that had always been a vital fulcrum of international
politics in the historical past.
That Afghanistan could throw up
a global problem for the US in future may still be a distant story but
for India the likely dominance of the Taliban there creates a challenge
in South Asia nearer home where developments could help Pakistan to
emerge as a stronger adversary. The US President primarily focused on
the rise of China as a potential superpower representing the ideological
rivalry between a democratic system and a one-party dictatorship, may
not quite understand the reality of the Indian subcontinent -- of how a
communally based partition accompanying the Independence of India had
continued to poison the politics of South Asia enabling Pakistan to play
the Muslim card against India in the region on both external and
internal issues. President Biden has gone by the 'comfort of distance'
that the Doha Peace Agreement offered to the US against the terrorist
threat from Islamic radicals -- India does not share any of it and has
to plan for an enhanced danger of exposure to Pak-instigated militancy
rooted in Islam.
A combination of three factors seemed to be
helping Pakistan to have its way in Afghanistan -- willingness of the US
President to end the American military involvement in Afghanistan on
the basis of a half-baked 'peace agreement' with the Taliban, implicit
endorsement by the Imran regime of Afghan Taliban that derived strength
from the bases it had in Khyber Pakhtunwa (KP), the historical
birthplace of this anti-US radical force, and the geopolitical advantage
that Pakistan had gained from the Sino-Pak military alliance.
Correspondingly, India's presence and role in assisting Afghanistan has
become less tenable because of growing instability in that country.
The
process of consultation between the major stake holders including US,
Russia, Iran, India and the regional forces represented by the
neighbouring countries did not catch up strongly enough to secure a
place for India at the Afghan round table. As a consequence, the threat
of faith-based terror emanating from the Pak-Afghan belt seemed to be
deepening for India. India has to remain proactive about mobilising
international opinion in favour of a democratic Afghanistan, prepared
against a possible escalation of the threat of cross-border terrorism in
Kashmir and elsewhere from an emboldened Pakistan and engaged in
constantly building its capabilities of countering any aggressiveness of
the two hostile neighbours on the borders.
This is the time for
India to assert its role as the predominant power in South Asia and work
for the security of the region by consolidating its relationship with
Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives and the ASEAN on the one hand and
actively supporting QUAD for the broad security of the Indian Ocean
against any Chinese moves, on the other. Indo-US relations have to be
put on a solid strategic footing since the two democracies had the same
global commons. The Biden Administration's emphasis on rebuilding the
bonds with NATO in pursuing the policy of countering any threats
'jointly with its allies' suits India because among other things many
European nations face the ire of Islamic radicals, like India does in
this part of the world. These countries have denounced Pakistan in no
uncertain terms for harbouring Islamic extremists and terrorists and
their friendship is valuable for India for this alone, the shared values
of democracy providing a basic link in addition.
The Indian
economy has been hit hard because of the pandemic -- this has been a
global phenomenon -- but its 'revival from below' backed by Prime
Minister Modi's perceptive policy of 'vocal for local' suits the genius
of India and has already produced a visible impact. If even President
Biden's Jobs Plan aims at executing a 'blue collar blueprint for
building America' then India's emphasis on restoring the strength of
'the middle class' made a lot of sense. India had the advantage of
having many leaders in business who had a global reach -- this would
keep the top of India's economic pyramid strong while the local effort
went into reviving its base.
A steady shift of the global scene
towards bipolarity between the US with its allies leading the democratic
world on the one hand and China with its one-party dictatorship
heading, on the other, the residual Communist empire left at the end of
the Cold War, affects all geographies but the play of Pakistan in this
equation makes South Asia the region of prime concern for India. The
strategic alliance between China and Pakistan representing the axis of a
Communist dictatorship with a regime wedded to Islamic fundamentalism,
adds to the security concerns of India that have to be meted out with a
well-considered framework of strategic response.
First is the
challenge in Jammu and Kashmir, more so in Ladakh, on account of the
Chinese grip on Pakistan that had become progressively strong because of
the ambitious CPEC project built by China in POK on land ceded by
Pakistan for that purpose. The threat of Sino-Pak combine has to be
countered in Ladakh particularly after the build-up of PLA there and it
is only natural for India to seek to make its military presence there
strong enough with the help of aerial power, to provide a deterrent
against the adversaries. China wants an opening into the Arabian Sea but
it would be aware also of the vulnerability of its economic corridor to
India's prowess.
The second concern for India arises from the
likely domination of Taliban in a future set-up in Afghanistan -- it
could even be the restoration of the Afghan Emirate that Pakistan had
installed at Kabul in 1996. Chinese support to Pakistan in Afghanistan
would at least partly be in lieu of the Pak silence on the mistreatment
of Muslim minorities in China. China's foreign ministry has in a fresh
statement found fault with the US for forcing a rule of its ideological
choice in Afghanistan in the name of 'freedom and democracy'. India can
clearly see that Imran Khan's Pakistan had become recalcitrant towards
US and beyond posturing as a friend of America helping the peace
dialogue between the US and Taliban in Afghanistan, it had no intention
of drawing down on its 'all weather friendship' with China. India had to
fight another battle with Pakistan, in Afghanistan. The pullout of
American troops from there, in a somewhat messy situation, leaves India
only with the diplomatic turf to work on and nearer home with the only
option of stepping up its effort to thwart an increased threat of
Mujahideen violence in the Kashmir valley. And finally, India has to
deal with the operational capability both Pakistan and China have of
fishing in the troubled waters of India's domestic scene -- from Punjab
to the North-East and even down South.
Prime Minister Modi's
foreign policy has largely rested on bilateral relations and some
multilateral associations designed to serve the economic and security
interests of all sides. This has served India well by taking national
security out of the ideological packaging of the past and letting go of
the baggage of the Cold War. India needs to have relations with Israel,
Iran and the Gulf states and keep up its defence dealings with Russia to
maintain the sovereignty of its own security without hurting its other
strategic partners. Our diplomacy has been able to achieve this
equilibrium and must be complimented for the same. Our national security
doctrine has proved to be very effective, upfront and convincing -- the
response of the international community to our stand on
security-related issues like Kashmir, has confirmed it. These are the
times requiring close monitoring of the external threats and an equally
close attention to various facets of our internal security.
(The writer is a former Director Intelligence Bureau)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs Exchange Rates |
Currency |
Import |
Export |
US Dollar
|
84.35
|
82.60 |
UK Pound
|
106.35
|
102.90 |
Euro
|
92.50
|
89.35 |
Japanese
Yen |
55.05 |
53.40 |
As on 12 Oct, 2024 |
|
|
Daily Poll |
|
|
Will the new MSME credit assessment model simplify financing? |
|
|
|
|
|
Commented Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|