|
|
|
Software is eating trade, digital platforms replacing agreements
|
|
|
|
Top Stories |
|
|
|
|
K. Yatish Rajawat | 19 Nov, 2019
Since India rejected RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership)
with ASEAN and six other countries, most commentators have focused on
reasons for exit. The government has reiterated that it was a decision
in the interest of the country. Impact on farmers due to agri-imports
impact is one of the dominant reason. There are more powerful forces at
play shaping the structure of global trade that India needs to account
for in any trade negotiation going forward. Digitization of
global trade converts physical goods into bytes it allows delivery and
creation of services. It also creates a set of digital goods which are
globally transferable through platforms. Platte fourme of trade
The
term "platform" comes from French plateform or platte fourme, which
means "flat form." The word refers to a specific physical artifact: a
raised level surface. Global trade in services has been flat much before
a NYT columnist popularized the term. Now, in this flat world digital
platform are seizing control of global trade. These platform with their
global supply chains have become omnipotent and omniscient.
Amazon,
JingDing, Alibaba, Rakuten, B2W Copahina Digital are some of the
largest E-commerce platform controlling flow of global goods. These
powerful brands are known as consumer brands and their impact is seen
only on the retail sector. The sectoral myopia obfuscates their impact
on global trade. In a way now software is eating trade agreements
countries need to wake up to this realization.
Global e-commerce
sales grew 13 per cent in 2017, touching $29 trillion, according to data
released by United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
in March 2019. The number of online shoppers, jumped by 12 per cent and
stood at 1.3 billion people, or one quarter of the world's population.
Though most internet buyers purchased goods and services from domestic
vendors, the share of those buying from abroad rose from 15 per cent in
2015 to 21 per cent in 2017. As a result, cross-border
business-to-consumer (B2C) sales reached an estimated $412 billion,
accounting for almost 11 per cent of total B2C e-commerce, as per UCTAD.
These are estimates based on statistics collected by countries and are
indicative of the shift of trade through global digital platform.
Experts believe that their impact is much larger and growing much faster
than the numbers shown by UNCTAD.
Governments cannot fully
capture the data of global trade taking place through E-commerce
platforms as their systems are not designed to track single package
shipments. The American Association of exporters and importers made up
of shipping companies estimates that global cross border B2C E-commerce
sales will hit $1 trillion by 2020. Most of this growth will come in
Asia-Pacific and India is the largest consumer market.
Since the
recession of 2008, global trade has remained flat while e-commerce has
increased 20% per year. Government everywhere including India is
clueless about the impact of these digital platforms. Government's
control system for trade like custom duties are focused on large
shipments and cannot track or levy duties on single shipments. This is
also referred as ‘de minimis provisions' basically the threshold below
which no customs duties are collected.
Earlier this year in
March 2019, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) set up a working group to measure the impact of digital global
trade. Besides, physical goods it includes services and digital goods
which are being transferred through these platforms. Digital trade is
defined as product that digital ordered and digital delivered.
Movies
used to be consumed locally in a cinema and tracked and taxed through
ticket sales. Now it is digital ordered and delivered on Netflix. This
creates a new category of digital trade is not tracked or monitored by
government as a trade item. Airbnb selling hotel services is not
captured under global trade, Uber selling taxi services locally but
booking revenues globally does not get recognized as an import of
service by national statistician tracking trade. Another
complication of digital trade through platform is when the buyer pays it
in crypto-currency or from an international bank account or global
wallet. Such transaction may not be completed in the country where the
consumer or consumption happens.
Similarly, services being
rendered by individuals on a global platform are very difficult to
track. Their impact on trade is not measured and not taken into account
for the purpose of negotiation in FTAs.
As global trade moves to
bytes using digital infrastructure like cloud services and E-commerce
platforms. The physical intermediaries between buyer and producer vanish
as a result identification of taxation and duties become difficult. It
also means that digital information of goods can jump several borders
before the physical good finally lands in the buyer hands. This creates
issues around the origin of the product, sale, profit and resulting
transfer pricing norms. The digital data trail of the transaction is
crucial in establishing the origin, consumption and taxation. This is
not envisaged as part of trade agreements.
Hence, the flow of
data on such transactions has to be established. Even to prevent dumping
from China through global platforms it is data that will determine the
origin of products. Allowing discovery of such data is important for the
future of trade.
India has been trying to bring E-commerce under
the WTO rules. It also needs to clearly establish guidelines for its
usage under the FTAs with ASEAN or any other country.
It is
important that data flows be free within countries and conflict
resolution on transaction be defined under sovereign laws. A free market
defining transaction data in the digital world is the most important
consideration in every FTA going forward. Digital transaction has to be
linked product origin rules to ensure that there is no dumping happening
using electronic platforms. Currently, Chinese companies are dumping in
India using FTA, DTAA and E-commerce platforms. This causes enormous
harm to India's labor intensive industry.
A crucial inclusion in
every FTAs has to be recognition of sovereignty of transaction data.
Transactions are rapidly moving from the real world to the digital
world. As digital transaction become the norm, taxation and economic
growth will be determined by data. It is important that future FTAs
acknowledge the source and origin of transactions and India demand
sovereign rights over such data. This will prevent conflict around
taxation and duties and create a much more conducive environment around
trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs Exchange Rates |
Currency |
Import |
Export |
US Dollar
|
84.35
|
82.60 |
UK Pound
|
106.35
|
102.90 |
Euro
|
92.50
|
89.35 |
Japanese
Yen |
55.05 |
53.40 |
As on 12 Oct, 2024 |
|
|
Daily Poll |
|
|
Will the new MSME credit assessment model simplify financing? |
|
|
|
|
|
Commented Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|