|
|
Is the government in a pre-election haste to revamp green laws?
|
|
|
|
Top Stories |
|
|
|
|
Mayank Aggarwal | 17 Jul, 2018
It is the final leg of the current Indian governments tenure, which
began in 2014. As the general elections loom, the Prime Minister
Narendra Modi-led government has gone into hyperactive mode over the
past year, proposing a major overhaul of the countrys environmental laws
that govern its forests, fragile coasts, precious wildlife and manage
the toxic levels of air pollution.
Once the proposed
changes are finalised they will become the cornerstone for India's
environment sector policy for at least the next two decades. However,
environmentalists point out that the changes seem like they have been
proposed in quick succession to avoid wider and detailed consultations
among all stakeholders and speed up the process of finalisation.
They
also allege that the proposed changes are not focused on protecting and
conserving the environment but instead, are looking at making
environmental laws easier for growth of industries - a promise made by
PM Modi just before the 2014 general elections.
Tinkering with
the country's green laws is not new for the current government. Since
coming to power in May 2014, it has implemented a series of environment
law-related changes. However, it has not yet been able to intiate any
big-ticket plans. With the general elections now scheduled to take place
in first the half of 2019, the government has hit the gas to implement
large-scale changes.
Land, water and air
In October 2017,
the government finalised the third National Wildlife Action Plan
(2017-31) of India. The first such plan was adopted in 1983 and the
second in 2002 which ended in 2016.
This NWAP along with three
proposed action plans, concerning forests, coasts and air pollution, are
critical for this government as together they will form the core of
environmental regulation in the country and will be related to the
majority of the developmental work planned by the government.
A
set of major changes are outlined in the draft National Forest Policy
(NFP) 2018 which was unveiled by India's Ministry of Environment, Forest
and Climate Change (MoEFCC) in March 2018. The ministry had sought
comments on it from experts and all other stakeholders by April 14 2018.
The draft was criticised by activists who stated that the changes
proposed are just an opening for the private sector to advance into the
forestry sector. Once finalised, the policy will be significant for
India's forest sector as it will be the overarching document for
management of forests over the next 25-30 years.
The first NFP
took effect in 1952 while the second edition was adopted in 1988. At
present, the second edition is in force. The latest draft is in line
with the government's vision of having 33 percent of India's total
geographical area under forest and tree cover.
According to a
senior official in the forest division of the MoEFCC, a range of
responses have been received on the draft NFP 2018, including from
political parties (mainly the left-wing parties). "The suggestions,
views and recommendations are being examined and it will soon be
finalised during the next couple of months. We will address all concerns
raised," the official stated.
However, this is not the first
attempt at updating the NFP as efforts towards it started soon after the
National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government assumed power in May
2014. One version of the draft NFP was put online in 2016 but the
government later backtracked and withdrew the draft.
"It is not
the first time that the environmental laws are being diluted. There has
been a consistent endeavour by the government to weaken the green laws
in recent years. The draft national forest policy 2018 is nothing but a
repackaged form of the changes proposed earlier for opening up the
forests for the private sector. Those changes were vociferously opposed,
but now the government is again trying for privatisation of forests
through the new national forest policy," said Tushar Dash, forest rights
expert and activist working with tribals and forest dwellers in Odisha.
Besides
forests, India's 7,500-kilometre coastline is also staring at a
complete makeover with the government looking at replacing the Coastal
Regulation Zone (CRZ) notification 2011. The environment ministry had
made public the draft CRZ notification 2018 in April this year, giving
all interested stakeholders 60 days to submit their suggestions.
According
to environmentalists, the latest draft CRZ Notification 2018 proposes
to open up the coastline for the industry, real estate and tourism
sector rather than protecting the fragile coast. However, it doesn't
come as a surprise to many as the changes proposed are crucial to the
Modi government's flagship programmes such as Sagarmala and Housing for
All.
Environmentalists who have been closely tracking the changes
being made by the government argue that it is not just the extensive
changes that are being carried out that are a concern, but also that the
government has been amending rules without public consultation, in the
name of public interest.
"What is worse is several amendments
are being issued in the name of public interest and taking away the
opportunity for citizens to engage with these changes that are of the
order of exempting particular project types from approvals. This
practice only distances the citizens from their government," said Kanchi
Kohli, a legal research director at the Centre for Policy Research
(CPR)-Namati Environmental Justice Programme.
Similar has been
the case of Indian government's first National Clean Air Programme
(NCAP). The proposed national action programme to tackle toxic levels of
air pollution across nearly all major Indian cities, as well as rural
areas, was finally unveiled in April 2018 after years of hue and cry
over the issue. Comments were sought on it by May 17 and it is also in
the final stages of preparation. Though a good start, experts have
called it a toothless and directionless plan as it sets no targets for
reducing pollution from the cities.
Why this haste?
Senior
environmental lawyer in the Supreme Court of India, Sanjay Upadhyay,
cautioned against haste. "Make haste slowly. We are dealing with the
environment which is not a creation of man but a gift to the earth. So
any reform which has implications on the environment has to be thought
through carefully and not in a hurried fashion. More importantly, the
people who understand the sector on the ground need to be involved,"
said Upadhyay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs Exchange Rates |
Currency |
Import |
Export |
US Dollar
|
84.35
|
82.60 |
UK Pound
|
106.35
|
102.90 |
Euro
|
92.50
|
89.35 |
Japanese
Yen |
55.05 |
53.40 |
As on 12 Oct, 2024 |
|
|
Daily Poll |
|
|
Will the new MSME credit assessment model simplify financing? |
|
|
|
|
|
Commented Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|